Organization Culture and Employee Experience and its Impact on Turnover Intention

Paper ID: EIJTEM_2026_13_1_32-36

Author's Name: Dr. Nijina Jose, Ms.V.Vijayalakhmi, Ms.D.Madhumitha

Volume: 13

Issue: 1

Year: 2026

Page No: 32-36

Abstract:

The current existence of Gen Z, who just entered the workforce, is closely connected with high turnover in the organization. The relationship of employee experience to turnover intention is still inconsistent. This study aims to determine the impact of Positive Organizational Culture, Employee Experience, and Job Satisfaction on Turnover Intention. The quantitative research method is conducted, with a 75 sample of employees from Generation Z (born 1995-2000). The results of data processing using the Partial Least Square – Structural Equation Model (PLS-SEM) showed that Positive Organizational Culture and Employee Experience have a positive significant effect on Job Satisfaction. This study also showed the direct effect of Positive Organization Culture on Turnover intention but failed to show the direct effect of Employee Experience on Turnover intention. This study confirmed the relationship of Job Satisfaction to Turnover Intention

Keywords: Organization Culture, Employee Experience, Turnover Intention

References:

1. G. Dessler, Human Resource Management Sixteenth Edition, 16th ed. Pearson, 2017.
2. F. Alfawaire and T. Atan, “The effect of strategic human resource and knowledge management on sustainable competitive advantages at Jordanian universities: The mediating role of organizational innovation,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 13, no. 15, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13158445.
3. S. M. Thin, B. Chongmelaxme, S. Watcharadamrongkun, T. Kanjanarach, B. A. Sorofman, and T. Kittisopee, “A systematic review on pharmacists’ turnover and turnover intention,” Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, vol. 18, no. 11.
4. Elsevier Inc., pp. 3884–3894, Nov. 01, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.05.014.
5. J. Idiegbeyan-ose and R. Opeke, “Influence of Organisational Culture on Turnover Intention of Library Staff in Private University Libraries, South-West Nigeria,” 2018.
6. F. Costan et al., “Teachers’ Turnover Intentions in View of Implementing a Flexible Learning System: An Extended Theory of Planned Behavior,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 14, no. 20, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.3390/su142013009.
7. G. K. Saini and I. M. Jawahar, “The influence of employer rankings, employment experience, and employee characteristics on employer branding as an employer of choice,” Career Development International, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 636–657, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1108/CDI-11-2018-0290.
8. P. Hovorka, “Employee Satisfaction Is Not Enough,” Jan. 2019, [Online]. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/employee-.
9. S. Kim, L. Tam, J. N. Kim, and Y. Rhee, “Determinants of employee turnover intention: Understanding the roles of organizational justice, supervisory justice, authoritarian organizational culture and organization-employee relationship quality,” Corporate Communications, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 308–328, 2017, doi: 10.1108/CCIJ-11- 2016-0074.
10. Y.Tsai, “Relationship between Organizational Culture, Leadership Behavior and Job Satisfaction,”2011.[Online]. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472- 6963/11/98 (Accessed Date: September 4, 2023)
11. E. Wang, W. Jiang, and S. Mao, “Job Autonomy and Turnover Intention among Social Workers in China: Roles of Work-to- family Enrichment, Job Satisfaction and Type of Sector,” J Soc Serv Res, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 862–876, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1080/01488376.2019.1698487.
12. J. Plaskoff, “Employee experience: the new human resource management approach,” Strategic HR Review, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 136– 141, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1108/shr-12-2016- 0108.
13. M. Laiho, E. Saru, and H. Seeck, “‘It’s the work climate that keeps me here’: the interplay between the HRM process and emergent factors in the construction of employee experiences,” Personnel Review, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 444–463, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1108/PR-09-2020-0663.
14. E. Tucker, “Driving engagement with the employee experience,” Strategic HR Review, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 183–187, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1108/shr-03-2020-0023.

View PDF